
TLDR: Trigify access ends October 22, 2026 for standard customers, so export your data first. Then pick Gojiberry for all-in-one discovery and outreach, Signado for qualified LinkedIn conversation leads, Apollo for contact data, Sales Navigator for native research, Clay for custom enrichment, PhantomBuster for extraction, or Common Room for multi-source activity.
The best Trigify alternative depends on what you used it for. Gojiberry is the closest all-in-one replacement: it finds prospects, enriches them, and runs the outreach. Signado is the closest replacement for Trigify's LinkedIn engagement discovery. It finds the people posting and commenting in your market and keeps their words with each lead.
Trigify alternatives are B2B tools that replace parts of Trigify's retired discovery, enrichment, and outreach workflow. On September 23, 2026, the company announced that its team is joining HubSpot and that the standalone platform is being retired. For most customers, access ends at 11:59pm British Summer Time (BST) on October 22, 2026. Account-specific notices may set different dates.
Trigify covered four needs: discovery and outreach, data and native research, custom workflows, and activity across many sources. Few products replace all four well. This guide groups the best replacements by what you need to keep working, starting broad and moving to narrower tools.
For a wider category view, read our guide to LinkedIn prospecting tools.
The 7 best Trigify alternatives at a glance
Each tool links to its own pricing page. We checked every price there in October 2026.
| Rank | Tool | Use it when | Starting price (checked October 2026) | Main limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gojiberry | You want one product to find, enrich, contact, and handle replies | $99/month (Pro) | LinkedIn campaigns need a connected account |
| 2 | Signado | You want qualified leads from LinkedIn posts and comments, with no LinkedIn login | $29/month (Lite, per workspace) | Covers LinkedIn, not X or Reddit |
| 3 | Apollo | You need contact data, enrichment, and email sequences after an export | Free plan; Basic $49/seat/month billed annually | Doesn't find social conversations |
| 4 | LinkedIn Sales Navigator | You want first-party LinkedIn search, lists, and alerts | Core $119.99/month per license | Most qualification stays manual |
| 5 | Clay | You want to build your own enrichment, scoring, and routing | Free plan; Launch $185/month ($167 billed annually) | You build and maintain the process |
| 6 | PhantomBuster | You need repeatable extraction across LinkedIn and other sites | Start $69/month ($56 billed annually) | You judge and clean the output |
| 7 | Common Room | You need one view across CRM, website, product, community, and social activity | $2,500/month, billed annually | High starting price |

What does the Trigify shutdown mean for customers?
Shutdown at a glance: Trigify is retiring its standalone product as members of its team join HubSpot. For standard customers, access ends at 11:59pm BST on October 22, 2026. Monitoring, signal collection, integrations, and API access stop at each account's end date. Accounts and customer data won't move to HubSpot.
Those details come from Trigify's September 23 shutdown announcement and its FAQ, which calls the deal HubSpot's acquisition of Trigify. Subscriptions won't renew past each account's end date. The company says it will handle final invoices, credits, and refunds account by account. It will retain or delete customer data under its contract, privacy, and legal duties.
The FAQ also answers the HubSpot question. The platform, customer accounts, and service won't continue inside HubSpot. There's no successor product to wait for.
In practice, every workflow that reads from Trigify goes quiet on your end date. That includes CRM syncs, Clay tables, alerts, webhooks, and outbound campaigns fed by its signals.
Why were people already looking for a Trigify alternative?
Many users wanted fewer moving parts before the shutdown. Reddit posts describe confusing filters and monitoring searches that broke, and some asked whether signal alerts were just noise. Others only needed LinkedIn and wanted a tool that didn't touch their account. The closure turned those complaints into a deadline.
In r/LeadGeneration, one user generating leads for clients wrote that Trigify was "a bit confusing" and that "the filters aint working properly too." A USA filter still returned "leads from Saudi Japan UK etc" (thread). In r/gtmengineering, a commenter called Trigify "the most broken/least reliable I've tried" for monitoring searches (thread).
Other posts were about fit. In r/hubspot, someone shopping for a client said Trigify and Apollo "connect to so many platforms that we don't need (only LinkedIn)." They asked for a tool "that doesn't need to connect to LinkedIn" (thread). Another r/LeadGeneration thread asked whether signal tools lead to better conversion "or just more noise" (thread).
So a good replacement gives you fewer results to clean and a short path from a found person to a message.
What should you save from Trigify?
If you still have access, export useful records and document why they mattered. A comma-separated values (CSV) file of names is weak if the source post, search rule, score, or next action disappears. Save the workflow while you can still inspect it. As one commenter in an r/SaaS thread about the closure put it, "people need their data before they need an alternative."
Use this order:
- Export people, companies, and any contact details you're allowed to retain.
- Save the source web address, original post text, date, and keyword behind each useful result when those fields are available.
- Copy your active searches, monitored topics, scoring rules, and exclusion lists.
- Record where every integration sends data, including customer relationship management (CRM) fields, application programming interface (API) calls, alerts, and outbound tools.
- Keep a small set of strong and weak results. You'll use them to test replacement tools against the same evidence.
The FAQ tells customers to save what they need with its existing export options before access ends. It doesn't promise exports after closure. If your account remains open, export now and again near the date in your customer notice. If access has ended, email hugo@trigify.io, the support address in the FAQ, and ask what can still be obtained. Availability isn't promised.

What was Trigify?
Trigify was a social listening and signal tool for B2B teams. It watched buying signals across more than 11 social platforms, including LinkedIn, X, Reddit, and YouTube. It then turned that activity into named people with the source post attached. You could monitor profiles, run keyword searches, capture post engagement, and track account events such as job changes and hiring.
Results could feed a workflow builder, integrations, and an API. Jarvis, its AI co-pilot, could set up signal searches and workflows from a plain-English request. That made it a good fit for teams that wanted raw signals inside a system they built themselves. The Signado and Trigify comparison covers how the two products differed.
Trigify pros and cons
It did several things well:
- It watched more than 11 social platforms, so one tool covered LinkedIn, X, Reddit, and YouTube.
- Each result kept the person and the source post together.
- Workflows, integrations, and an API moved signals into other tools and AI agents.
- The Starter plan cost $40 a month, with a 14-day free trial.
Users also ran into real limits:
- You decided what to monitor, then tuned searches and filters until the results were usable.
- Credits paid for signals, enrichment, engagement, and Jarvis runs, so the monthly cost moved with volume.
- Starter capped you at 50 tracked profiles, 25 listening searches, and 7 days of search history.
- Some users reported broken filters and unreliable monitoring searches.
- The product is closing, and no version continues inside HubSpot.
How much did Trigify cost?
Trigify's last public pricing page, archived on August 4, 2026, listed three plans on one credit system with a 14-day free trial. The pricing page now redirects to the shutdown notice. Treat these as reference prices, not plans you can buy.
| Plan | Price | Credits per month | Limits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $40/month | 4,000 | 50 social signal profiles, 25 listening searches, 7-day search history |
| Max | $199/month | 40,000 | 5,000 profiles, unlimited listening searches, 12-month search history |
| Enterprise | Custom | Unlimited | Custom profiles, all-time search history |
Extra usage cost $0.012 per credit. So a busy month of broad searches cost more than a quiet one, and the bill was hard to predict. If Max carried your weekly discovery, $199 a month is the baseline your replacement has to beat.
What a team of three pays in year one
Here is a rough year-one budget for three people replacing Trigify's LinkedIn discovery. These are our estimates from list prices, before tax, add-ons, and extra credits.
| Tool | Plan for three people | Year one (estimate) | How we got it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trigify (closed) | Max | $2,388 | $199 a month × 12 from the archived pricing page. No per-seat fee was listed. No longer for sale. |
| Gojiberry | Pro | $1,188 or more | $99 a month × 12. Pro includes two AI agents. More senders need a custom plan. |
| Signado | Starter | $708 | $59 a month × 12 for one shared workspace with 2,500 credits a month, enough for up to 500 new leads. |
| Clay | Launch | $2,004 | $167 a month × 12 on annual billing. Monthly billing is $185 a month, or $2,220 a year. |
| LinkedIn Sales Navigator | Core × 3 | $3,240 | $1,079.88 per license per year × 3, rounded. Core is a single-user plan. |
The gap comes from how each tool charges. Sales Navigator charges per person. Signado charges per workspace, so three people share one credit pool. Gojiberry charges per plan, and Clay's cost grows with the actions and data credits your tables use.
How we compared Trigify alternatives
We checked each vendor's own pages in October 2026 for source coverage, enrichment, outreach, integrations, and pricing. We also checked what arrives after a tool finds someone, because a service founder needs the source context and fit reason, not another name to research. The ranking favors tools that cover more of the old discovery-to-outreach path, and the groups below matter more than the numbers. These aren't hands-on benchmarks, and prices change, so check each vendor page before you buy.
Replace Trigify's lead discovery and outreach
Gojiberry for one-product discovery and outreach
Gojiberry is the closest single-product replacement here. It finds buyers from public web sources and social buying signals, scores prospects using those intent signals, enriches contact records through more than 15 data providers, runs outreach, and keeps replies in one inbox. It also connects to a CRM and offers an API plus Model Context Protocol (MCP), a standard for connecting artificial intelligence tools.
The Pro plan costs $99 a month. It includes two AI agents and supports up to 1,800 contacted prospects each month, according to Gojiberry. Teams that need more senders move to a custom plan.
This is the clearest fit when you want discovery, enrichment, multi-channel contact, and reply handling under one subscription. Fewer handoffs means fewer places for a lead to stall between the signal and the first message.
To test it, give one agent the ideal client profile you used in Trigify and turn on Review Mode, which lets you approve each lead and message before anything is sent. After a week, count how many prospects you'd have picked yourself and how many drafts you'd send without edits.
Check how LinkedIn sending works before you commit. Discovery can run without a LinkedIn connection, but Gojiberry's help center says a connected LinkedIn account is required to send campaigns. LinkedIn's automation policy says third-party software must not automate activity on its site. The Gojiberry comparison covers that difference in detail.
Choose Gojiberry when you want the tool to contact people for you. Skip it if nothing should run through your LinkedIn account.
Signado for qualified LinkedIn conversation leads
If Trigify found your leads in LinkedIn posts and comments, Signado is the closest replacement for that part of the workflow. Checking those conversations by hand leaves you with too many profiles and too little reason to contact any one person. Signado watches keywords, creators, competitors, and selected posts, then gives you the person, company, original words, fit reason, and suggested next move in one warm-leads feed.
That context changes the first message. You can contact the person who discussed a problem your agency solves and refer to what they actually said, instead of opening with a generic line based on their profile. High-fit accounts can also be checked for company events, such as funding or hiring, before you write.
The difference shows up in replies. In our one-account LinkedIn comments test, classic targeting got 25 replies from 139 messages. Starting from recent posts and comments got 78 replies from 149 messages, 2.9 times the reply rate. It's Signado's own test, and the page documents the setup step by step.
The switch is simple. Rebuild the Trigify searches that produced replies as Signado sources: a keyword, a creator your buyers follow, a competitor, or one post. There's no LinkedIn login, cookies, or browser extension to set up. Leads can go out through Gmail, Google Workspace, custom SMTP, Instantly, HeyReach, a webhook, Zapier, Make, n8n, or CSV, so the workflows the old tool fed can point here instead.
Test it with the ten strong Trigify results you saved. Add the same creator or competitor as a source, then read the first review group. Do the people match your market, and does each one come with a comment worth answering?
Lite costs $29 a month for one workspace with 1,000 credits. Each new qualified lead uses five credits, so that's up to 200 new leads a month. Every paid plan starts with a 7-day free trial (card required), and current plan details are on the pricing page.
Pair it with Clay or Common Room if you also tracked X or Reddit in Trigify. Choose Signado when LinkedIn is where your buyers talk and you want a short list of people worth contacting each week.
Replace enrichment and LinkedIn research
Apollo for enrichment and outbound after an export
Apollo fits the part after Trigify finds someone. You can upload a CSV, enrich people and companies, find contact details, score records, and move selected prospects into email sequences or your CRM. Apollo says its database covers more than 240 million contacts.
Apollo's free plan lets you test the data. Paid plans start with Basic at $49 per seat a month billed annually, or $65 month to month. The company says more than 600,000 companies use it, and it's an established choice when the missing piece is contact data and email outreach.
Upload 20 rows from your Trigify export and count how many come back with a correct, current email and role. That number tells you whether Apollo fills the contact gap.
Choose Apollo when you've exported your records or already know the companies and roles you want. The limit is discovery context. Apollo can add buying signals and contact data, but it doesn't replace monitoring public social conversations and keeping the original post or comment.
LinkedIn Sales Navigator for native research
LinkedIn Sales Navigator keeps research inside LinkedIn. Core gives you advanced people and company search, saved lists, and alerts, starting at $119.99 a month per license or $1,079.88 a year. Advanced costs $159.99 a month and adds Buyer Intent signals and team features.
Use it when you want first-party LinkedIn filters and prefer to review profiles yourself. A saved search can keep a target market visible, while alerts provide reasons to revisit specific accounts.
Rebuild one Trigify search as a saved search and run it for a week. Count how many alerts give you a real reason to write, and how long each one takes to turn into a message.
The tradeoff is the work after the search. Sales Navigator doesn't turn relevant LinkedIn posts, likes and comments, or competitor audiences into a reviewed list with a fit reason. You still decide who matters, collect context, enrich records elsewhere, and plan the outreach. Choose it when you want native search and are happy to qualify by hand.
Build your own signal stack
Clay for custom enrichment and scoring
Clay fits teams that want to design their own enrichment, scoring, and routing process. You choose data providers, build table rules, enrich records, and send results to a CRM or outbound tool. Its Signals feature on paid plans covers job changes, promotions, new hires, company news, and social activity.
Clay has a free plan with 500 actions and 100 data credits a month. Launch costs $185 a month, or $167 a month billed annually. That price doesn't include the time needed to decide which data matters, control credit use, and repair a workflow when a provider or field changes.
If your Trigify signals already fed a Clay table, keep the table and replace only the source. Then rebuild one workflow with 20 records. Track which provider filled each field, which records were scored correctly, and what the run cost.
Choose Clay when custom logic is the point. It can combine more sources than a focused LinkedIn lead tool, but someone must own the build and upkeep. If you want a ready feed rather than a flexible workbench, it may create more work than it removes. Our guide to Clay alternatives covers that tradeoff.
PhantomBuster for extraction and repeat automation
PhantomBuster is a collection of repeatable automations for LinkedIn and other sites. It can collect people from a search or post, add data, run on a schedule, and export results for another step.
After a 14-day free trial, Start costs $69 a month, or $56 a month billed annually, with 20 hours of run time. This route suits a clear, repeatable task, such as collecting post engagers into a CSV and passing them to an enrichment tool.
Point one automation at a post you tracked in Trigify, export the people, and time how long it takes to clean and qualify the list. That cleanup time is the real cost.
The limit is judgment. PhantomBuster runs the steps you configure, but you still decide whether the result matches your ideal client profile, what the activity means, and what happens next. Some supported actions use connected accounts, so the same LinkedIn policy question applies before you automate activity. Choose PhantomBuster when you know exactly what to collect and have time to clean it. Skip it if you want a reviewed list.
Replace enterprise multi-source intelligence
Common Room for one view across many systems
Common Room brings activity from a CRM, website, product, communities, and sources beyond LinkedIn into shared person and company records. It supports scoring, alerts, contact research, and workflows for companies that need several sources in one place.
The Essential plan costs $2,500 a month and is billed annually. It includes five seats, up to 100,000 contacts, research credits, prospecting credits, alerts, and workflows.
Test it with 20 accounts you already understand. Bring in their CRM status, website activity, one product or community event, and one social action. Then check whether each person and company record keeps enough source context for someone else to act without reopening every system.
When that test works, several people can see the same account history and avoid duplicate or badly timed outreach. Choose Common Room when missing activity across systems causes real coordination errors. Reject it when LinkedIn is your main source and one person reviews the leads, because the price and setup won't pay back.
How should you choose a Trigify alternative?
Start with what the old tool did for you each week. Then match that to the tool built for it.
| If Trigify mainly... | Start with | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Found people and fed your outreach | Gojiberry | One product finds, enriches, and contacts |
| Found people in LinkedIn posts and comments | Signado | Qualified leads with their words attached, no LinkedIn login |
| Fed a list you then enriched | Apollo | Contact data and email sequences for known names |
| Supported manual LinkedIn research | Sales Navigator | Native search, saved lists, and alerts |
| Fed a Clay table or custom workflow | Clay | Rebuild the logic with your own providers |
| Exported raw engagers to a sheet | PhantomBuster | Repeatable extraction on a schedule |
| Combined many sources for a larger team | Common Room | One record across CRM, product, website, and social |
Test each replacement against your own account, with the same sample and review window for both. Give each candidate ten strong and ten weak saved results, then ask it to reproduce the useful part: find the person, retain the source, explain the fit, or move the record.
Use a short migration test:
- Name the result you need each week, such as qualified LinkedIn leads, known-prospect engagement, or a custom enriched list.
- Give two candidates the same sample people, topics, and source posts.
- Count how many results you would actually contact and how much manual checking each one needs.
- Test the final handoff through CSV, CRM integration, or API before moving the full workflow.
The winner is the product your team will use with the least repair work. Feature count won't tell you that. A one-week test with your own examples will.
FAQ
When does Trigify shut down?
For standard customers, access ends at 11:59pm BST on October 22, 2026. Customers with different contract notice periods get their own date directly. Integrations, API access, monitoring, and signal collection stop when access ends, and accounts don't move to HubSpot.
How much should a Trigify replacement cost?
Compare total cost at your real lead volume. Include seats, connected accounts, data and enrichment credits, contact caps, any second tool, and upkeep time. For a team of three, our year-one estimates run from about $708 on Signado Starter to about $3,240 for three Sales Navigator Core licenses.
What is the cheapest Trigify alternative?
Among the paid plans in this guide, Signado Lite is the lowest at $29 a month for one workspace. PhantomBuster Start follows at $56 a month billed annually. Apollo and Clay also have free plans for testing. Compare the cost per lead you would actually contact, not the sticker price.
Should I wait for a HubSpot replacement?
No. The shutdown FAQ says the platform, customer accounts, and service won't continue inside HubSpot, and it describes no future HubSpot product. Choose for the workflow you need now. Revisit the decision only if HubSpot announces a real product you can assess.
Can I import a Trigify export into another tool?
Import compatibility depends on the fields in your CSV file. Test 20 rows first. Map the person, company, source, and evidence fields, then check for duplicate records and lost context before moving the full export.
Which Trigify replacement works without connecting a LinkedIn account?
Signado. It doesn't ask for a LinkedIn login, cookies, or a browser extension, because it runs its searches on its own infrastructure. It finds and qualifies people from LinkedIn posts and comments, and you choose how to contact them.
Should I replace Trigify with one tool or combine two?
Use one tool if it passes your test from discovery through contact. Combine two when the best source finder lacks the enrichment or outreach handoff you need. If Apollo already holds your contacts, keep it and add focused discovery. Test the connection with the same 20 records before paying for both.
If LinkedIn posts and comments are the part you need to replace, see how Signado finds warm leads and test one keyword before moving the rest of your workflow.
Choose LinkedIn prospecting tools
Compare search, research, and automation tools by the job you need done and the account access they require.
Start with the LinkedIn prospecting tools guideLinkedIn Social Listening Tools for Agencies and Consultants
Compare LinkedIn social listening tools for finding named people in relevant posts and comments, with current pricing, best uses, and limits.
Read article8 Best Clay Alternatives for 2026 (and What They Cost)
Compare 8 Clay alternatives by the part of Clay they replace, October 2026 prices, and what a team of three pays in year one.
Read article13 Best Social Selling Tools for B2B Sales (2026)
Compare social selling tools for LinkedIn prospecting, content, listening, outreach, enrichment, and warm-lead discovery from engagement.
Read articleThese tools all assume you know who to contact
Signado fills that gap: it finds the people already talking about what you do on LinkedIn, with what they said attached. Use it alone or feed the rest of your stack.