Your sales team sent 10,000 cold emails last quarter. Backlinko's analysis of 12 million outbound emails puts the average reply rate at 8.5%. That means 9,150 of those emails got nothing back — no reply, no click, no sign of life. Meanwhile, Dentsu's 2024 B2B Superpowers research found the average buying journey has stretched 16% longer since 2021. Reps are working harder to build pipeline from deals that take longer to land.
The instinct is to fix the message. Better subject lines, tighter copy, another A/B test on the CTA. But the actual problem isn't what you're saying. It's whether you're reaching the right person at the right time. A perfectly written email to a VP of Engineering who isn't evaluating tools right now gets deleted. The same email, sent the week after their company closes a Series B, gets a meeting.
That's signal-based selling. Unlike most sales methodologies, it's less of a new framework than a correction to how outbound should have worked all along.
What is signal-based selling?
Instead of cold-emailing a static list, your reps monitor target accounts for real-time events like funding rounds, leadership hires, and website visits to your pricing page, then reach out when something changes. The timing replaces the pitch as the primary conversion lever. The best message in the world won't matter if there's no buying window open.
Signal-based selling starts from a simple observation: buyers don't exist in a perpetual state of readiness. They enter and exit buying windows. A company that closed a $30M Series B is evaluating vendors right now. A company that just did a layoff is not. Traditional sales teams use lead scoring that assigns points based on static attributes (industry, revenue, job title) and treats every account on your list as equally worth pursuing. Signal-based selling doesn't.
The difference from traditional outbound is a matter of sequence. In lead scoring, you build an ideal customer profile, pull a list, and blast it. In signal-based selling, you build that same list but wait for evidence that a specific account has entered a buying window before spending time on outreach. The signal intelligence layer sits between your contact database and your outreach tool, acting as a filter that tells your GTM team where to focus today.
The Instantly 2026 Benchmark Report found that signal-personalized emails hit an 18% response rate. Compare that to the 8.5% cold baseline. The gap isn't explained by better copywriting. It's explained by better timing.
Why traditional outbound is a timing problem
Salesforce's State of Sales data shows reps spend only 30% of their time actively selling. The rest goes to research, admin, CRM updates, and figuring out which accounts to prioritize. For an eight-hour day, that's about two hours and twenty minutes of actual selling.
Most of that research time goes into answering one question: "Should I reach out to this account right now?" Without signals, the answer is a guess. Reps scroll LinkedIn, check Crunchbase, read press releases, and try to piece together whether something changed at a target account. Some teams assign account tiers and work them on rotation, which means high-priority accounts get attention whether they're in a buying window or not.
The waste compounds. An SDR spends 20 minutes researching an account, writes a personalized email, and sends it. The prospect isn't evaluating tools. No reply. The SDR moves to the next account and repeats the cycle. Multiply that across a team of ten reps and 200 accounts each, and you've got thousands of hours spent on outreach that lands outside any buying window.
Clari's analysis of 10 million sales opportunities found that the top 10% of sellers generate 65% of all revenue. They're not sending more emails. They're spending their time on accounts that are actually buying.
The five types of buying signals worth tracking
Not all signals carry the same weight. A pricing page visit and a blog post view both count as "engagement," but they imply very different levels of readiness to buy. Here's how to think about the signal types that matter for B2B sales teams.
Intent signals
These are actions a prospect takes that suggest they're actively researching solutions. Think keyword searches for your product category, competitor comparison pages, visits to G2 or TrustRadius, and branded search queries. Intent data providers like Bombora and 6sense aggregate this from content consumption patterns across publisher networks.
The catch: intent signals from third-party providers tell you a company is researching your category, not that a specific person wants to buy. They're directional, not definitive. A single intent surge at a target account means "something's happening." Combine it with other signals and you get closer to "someone's buying."
Engagement signals
First-party engagement is more specific than third-party intent. Someone visiting your pricing page, downloading a case study, or attending your webinar has interacted with your company directly. These buyer signals have a short shelf life. A pricing page visit that happened three weeks ago is stale. One that happened yesterday is worth a phone call.
Timing signals
External events that create buying windows — what practitioners call sales trigger events. A funding round gives you 2-8 weeks as budgets form and new initiatives launch. A new executive hire triggers a 90-day window where the incoming leader re-evaluates the tech stack. Hiring surges mean the team is growing and will need tools to support new headcount. These signals don't tell you the buyer is looking at your product. They tell you the buyer is likely to need it.
Funding rounds are particularly reliable. Capital injection creates both the budget and the urgency. A company that just raised a Series B has board pressure to drive revenue, which means they're hiring, evaluating tools, and making purchasing decisions on a compressed timeline.
Firmographic signals
Changes to a company's structure or technology that indicate shifting needs. A tech stack migration (moving from Salesforce to HubSpot) means they're re-evaluating adjacent tools too. Office expansion into new markets creates demand for localization, compliance, and regional sales tools. These are slower-moving than timing signals but often indicate larger contracts.
Social signals
Executive activity on LinkedIn, conference speaking slots, podcast appearances, and public commentary on industry trends. A CEO posting about "scaling our sales team" three times in a month is broadcasting a priority. A CRO speaking at SaaStr about "outbound at scale" is telling you exactly what they're focused on.
Social signals are weaker on their own but worth more when combined with other signal types. On their own, a LinkedIn post means someone had a thought. Stacked with a hiring surge and a funding round, it confirms momentum.
| Signal type | Example | Shelf life | Action window |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intent | Competitor comparison page visit | 1-7 days | Immediate |
| Engagement | Pricing page visit, case study download | 1-3 days | Same day to 48 hours |
| Timing | Series B funding, new CRO hired | 2-8 weeks | First 2 weeks strongest |
| Firmographic | Tech stack migration, office expansion | 1-3 months | Within first month |
| Social | Executive LinkedIn activity, conference talk | 2-4 weeks | Within first week |
How do you score and prioritize buying signals?
A practical scoring model rates each buyer signal on three dimensions: how strong is the buying intent, how recent is the event, and how well does the account match your ideal customer profile. Multiply those three scores to get a composite number that tells your reps which accounts deserve attention today versus next week versus next quarter.
Raw signal volume is noise. Ten signals from accounts that don't fit your ICP are worth less than one signal from a perfect-fit account in an active buying window. Scoring is what turns a firehose of alerts into a prioritized sales pipeline.
Signal tiering
Group your signals into three tiers based on urgency.
Tier 1 accounts have at least one high-intent signal in the last 48 hours. A pricing page visit, a direct competitor evaluation, or a demo request paired with a funding round. These get same-day outreach.
Tier 2 accounts show activity that suggests a buying window is opening but isn't confirmed. A hiring surge plus a new VP of Sales hire, or a Series A announcement from last month. These go into a structured nurture sequence with a check-in every few days.
Tier 3 accounts have weak or old signals. A blog post view from two weeks ago, a single LinkedIn interaction, a firmographic change without any corroborating evidence. These stay on the watchlist for monitoring, not active outreach.
Signal decay
Signals lose value at different rates. A pricing page visit is worth less with each passing hour. After 24-48 hours, the buyer has likely moved on or is already in conversation with a competitor. A funding round, by contrast, creates a buying window that lasts weeks. The company doesn't spend $30M overnight.
Signal decay is the reason most sales teams waste effort. They treat a two-week-old intent surge the same as a yesterday's pricing page hit. By the time the rep drafts an email referencing the old signal, the buyer has already signed with someone faster.
Multi-signal correlation
Individual signals are suggestions. Stacked signals are evidence.
A CRM shows a case study download. LinkedIn shows the company just hired a new CRO. Crunchbase shows a $40M Series C from last month. Each signal alone might not justify dropping everything to write an outreach sequence. Together, they paint a clear picture: this company is growing, has budget, has a new leader re-evaluating tools, and is actively researching solutions.
Signado uses a three-axis scoring model: intent strength (1-5) multiplied by recency (1-3) multiplied by account fit (1-3), producing a composite score up to 45. A pricing page visit (intent: 5) from yesterday (recency: 3) at a Series B SaaS company in your ICP (fit: 3) scores 45. A blog post view (intent: 1) from two weeks ago (recency: 1) at a company outside your vertical (fit: 1) scores 1. The gap between those two numbers is the gap between a booked meeting and a wasted hour.
What does a signal-based selling workflow look like?
This trigger-based selling workflow has four stages: build your list, set monitoring cadences, respond when signals fire, and review before sending. Each stage replaces a chunk of manual research with automated monitoring, but the rep stays in the loop for the final outreach decision.
Step 1: Build your target list
Start where you already have data. Pull companies from Apollo filtered by funding stage, headcount, industry, and geography. Export from LinkedIn Sales Navigator. Upload a CSV of accounts from your CRM. The quality of your signal-based selling results depends on the quality of your target list. Signals can't save a list of companies that would never buy from you.
Most teams start with 100-300 companies. That's enough to generate a consistent flow of signals without overwhelming reps with alerts.
Step 2: Set monitoring cadences
Not every account needs daily attention. This is where Signado uses two cadences: Priority list for daily monitoring of your highest-value targets, and Watchlist for weekly monitoring of accounts you're tracking longer-term. Match the cadence to the signal's expected decay rate. Fast-moving signals (demo requests, pricing page visits) need daily checks. Slower signals (funding, new hires) are fine on a weekly schedule.
The mistake most teams make here is monitoring everything at the same frequency. Daily alerts for 500 accounts means 500 potential notifications per day, and most won't be actionable. Tier your monitoring the same way you tier your signals.
Step 3: Signal fires, AI generates contextual outreach
When a signal fires on a target account, the monitoring layer surfaces it with context: what happened, when, and why it matters for your product. Signado's AI generates a highly personalized outreach draft that references the trigger and the company's situation. The draft isn't a template with a company name swapped in. It's built around the signal itself.
The difference between signal-triggered outreach and template-based sequences is specificity. "Hi Sarah, I noticed Acme Corp just closed a $25M Series B" gives the prospect a reason to believe you've done research. It also explains why you're reaching out now instead of three months ago.
Step 4: Rep reviews, personalizes, sends
The rep reads the AI draft, adds their own judgment (maybe they know the company's CTO from a previous role, or they've seen the prospect comment on a relevant LinkedIn post), and sends. The signal gives the rep a starting point and a timing rationale. The rep adds the human context that no algorithm can replicate.
This is where over-automation breaks things. Signal-based selling works because it combines machine-speed monitoring with human judgment on outreach. Remove the human review step and you're back to spray-and-pray with fancier targeting.
Common mistakes that break signal-based selling
Treating all signals as equal
A pricing page visit and a blog post view are not the same signal. One indicates a buyer who's ready to buy. The other indicates mild curiosity. When every signal triggers the same response (an email from your SDR), reps lose trust in the system. They start ignoring alerts, and the whole workflow collapses.
The fix is signal tiering. Define which signals justify immediate outreach, which justify a nurture touch, and which just update the account's score in your CRM. Not every signal deserves a rep's time.
Acting too late
Demandbase's guide to signal-based selling argues for "depth over breadth" in account selection, and the same principle applies to signal response time. A signal that's 48 hours old has lost most of its relevance for high-intent categories. The prospect has moved on, engaged with a competitor, or lost the internal momentum that created the buying window.
Response speed is the operational bottleneck of signal-based selling. It doesn't matter how good your signal detection is if it takes your team three days to act on an alert. Build your workflow so Tier 1 signals get same-day responses, even if that means deprioritizing lower-tier tasks.
Over-automating
Signals inform outreach. They don't replace judgment. A funding round at a target account is a signal. Whether to reference that funding in your email, how to frame it, and which person at the company to contact first are judgment calls that require context about the relationship and competitive situation.
The G2 2026 Report found that 60% of B2B teams now use AI in some part of their sales process. The teams getting results use AI for signal detection and draft generation, then have reps review and personalize before sending. The teams struggling use AI to send fully automated sequences triggered by any signal above a threshold. One approach treats AI as a research assistant. The other treats it as a sales rep. Only one works.
Tools and infrastructure
A signal-based selling stack has three layers: a contact database, a signal source, and an outreach tool. Most teams already have the first and third. The signal layer is the missing piece.
Your CRM (HubSpot, Salesforce) holds account data and tracks interactions. Your sales engagement tool (Instantly, Smartlead, Outreach) handles sequences and sending. Between them, you need something that monitors target accounts and tells your reps when to act.
The market for signal sources is fragmented. Cognism and ZoomInfo offer intent data alongside their contact databases. Bombora sells standalone intent data aggregated from publisher networks. 6sense builds predictive models from anonymous web traffic. LinkedIn Sales Navigator surfaces job changes and company updates. Each covers a slice of the signal picture.
The gap is integration. A CRM shows a prospect downloaded your case study. LinkedIn shows the company hired a new VP of Sales. Crunchbase shows a $20M Series B from last month. These real-time buying signals live in different tools, and no sales rep has time to check four dashboards every morning.
Signado stacks signals from multiple sources into a single prioritized feed. When three signals fire on the same account in the same week, they don't show up as three separate alerts. They show up as one high-priority account with a composite score and the context your rep needs to write a relevant message. That's signal stacking in practice — detecting events and connecting them into a single story your rep can act on.
If you're evaluating where to start, the minimum viable stack is your existing CRM plus one signal source plus your existing email tool. You don't need to buy five platforms to run signal-based selling. You need one good signal layer between the data you already have and the outreach you're already sending. See how Signado connects these pieces.
FAQ
How is signal-based selling different from intent data?
Use intent data when you need category-level demand signals across unknown accounts — it tells you which companies are researching your space, even if they're not on your radar yet. Use signal monitoring when you have a named target list and need to time your outreach. They solve different problems. Intent data expands your addressable market. Signal monitoring tells you when your existing targets are ready. If your pipeline problem is "we don't know who to sell to," start with intent data. If it's "we have a list but don't know when to reach out," start with signal monitoring. For a deeper comparison, see our breakdown of signal intelligence vs intent data.
Do I need a large tech stack to start?
No. Here's a realistic ramp-up. Week one: upload your existing list to a signal monitoring tool, connect one signal source, and send from whatever outreach tool your team already uses. Week two through four: evaluate whether your alert volume justifies adding a second signal source. Most teams don't need one until they're monitoring 300+ accounts. The most common mistake is buying tools before validating the workflow. Run signal-based selling manually for two weeks — check signals, write outreach by hand, track replies — before adding automation. You'll learn which signals actually convert for your GTM strategy before spending budget on a full stack.
Is signal-based selling only for enterprise teams?
Small teams actually benefit more. An enterprise team with 50 SDRs can brute-force coverage by assigning reps to accounts. A five-person team can't afford to waste outreach on accounts that aren't in a buying window. Signal-based selling is a prioritization framework for sales and marketing teams of any size. The fewer resources you have, the more prioritization matters. Signado prices per workspace starting at $149/month, not per user, specifically because small teams shouldn't pay enterprise rates to get signal intelligence.
What is the 70/30 rule in sales?
The 70/30 rule says a salesperson should listen 70% of the time and talk 30% during a sales conversation. In the context of signal-based selling, there's a parallel: your system should be listening (monitoring signals) 70% of the time and acting (sending outreach) 30% of the time. Most teams invert this ratio. They spend the majority of their effort on outreach volume and a fraction on understanding whether the timing is right. Flipping that ratio is what separates signal-based sellers from everyone else running the same playbook with a bigger email list.
Start sending outreach that references real events
Your next reply starts with the right signal.